Thursday, January 27, 2005

In the name of efficiency

Police around the world live in a paradox that is seemingly impossible to break - How does one stop crimes before they happen? Think about it, a crime is not a crime until it is committed, and a criminal isn't a criminal until he is proven guilty of the crime. Without the technology used by Tom Cruise in Minority Report, how does one prevent a crime from happening?

Police in the US and in many parts of the world use a technique called 'Profiling'. This technique requires a policeman to look out for criminals by matching visual profiles of a person with known offenders. Considering that the country's most underprivileged classes of people are either Black or Hispanic, this is usually what the police are looking for. But the problem with this system is obvious - the innocent Black and Hispanic American get caught in the middle and suffer quite a bit of inconvenience, leave alone the humiliation of belonging to a community that is largely responsible for committing the crimes. But why should the larger group have to suffer for the sake of the few (yes, by definition, criminals are the minority in any group).

The answer can probably be found in the way the Human Brain functions. Due to it's own inabilities, it organizes large bodies of information by grouping individual components together. Then, all it has to do is remember that Group A has certain characteristics and Group B has a certain different set of characteristics. If there are exceptions, they are automatically classified into a third group. By this method, the brain simply has to remember three different sets of characteristics rather than say, a hundred and fifty individual characteristics. This was the method that led primitive cavemen to remember that green fruits were not ripe and should not be eaten as they are usually bitter, whereas colored fruits were usually ripe and sweet.

You can observe kids doing this all the time. For them, everything around is new and needs to be explored. But there is a process to this exploration. They relate everything to what they already know, unless it is so out of the realm of their understanding, in which case they usually seek help from an adult who will break it down for them. I wouldn't be surprised if kids made sense of the two parents as equivalents with small differences. For instance, 'Dad' is simply 'Mom' without the high pitched voice. Or, an orange is an apple of a different color and different taste. And so on.

But what's funny is that we as adults do this all the time as well. We don't ever grow out of this habit. The rationale that's behind this is probably "It's been successful so far, why not now?" Whenever we run into something new, we usually try to relate it to something we have a good understanding of. I remember, when the Digital Diary revolution came around most people didn't know how to understand this new gadget. But advertising helped relate the new to the familiar. They posted advertisements everywhere saying things like "No more maintaining new calendars every year.", or "Recall a friends number more efficiently than your regular diary!" - at every step trying to associate the new gadget's capabilities with the old method of doing things. "It's the same, but much better!"

Most of us understand the people around us in the same way. We build groups of people and try to fit every new person we are introduced to, into one of these groups. At first the groups are broad such as "White", "Black", "Indian", "Tambi" or "Filipino". Then the groups become more and more refined such as "Student", "Geek" or "Chess Player". The better we get to know the person, the better refined his or her group is. This goes on until we hit a point where this person is the only one within that group called "Adrian" or "Aditya".

If we analyze all of the people we know, we will see that everyone is but a unique combination of a limitless set of characteristics. Genetics and the environment have shaped each one of them into a unique personality. So if this is the case, how right are we usually to start off with the broad classifications? By doing so, we are encouraging ourselves to proceed in the wrong direction in thinking about a person. As a survival mechanism, it's not very effective. Its fine if we do it for objects or concepts, but when it comes to people, we can go wrong. Very wrong. Police could end up terrorizing certain groups of people for just being Black or Hispanic. People could be denied jobs that they are perfectly qualified for because they are not good looking. Innocent people could be sentenced to death because, on the surface, they match the broad characteristics of murderers.

So why do we continue to use an inefficient method to live our lives? One answer provided by an anthropologist by the name of Robin Dunbar is that the human cortex has a limitation in its ability to maintain more than 147.8 (~150) individual profiles in the brain. This might seem like a small number but this actually translates to the brain understanding the relationships between you and each of the 150 people and their relationships between each other, which is in fact a very large number. This study is based on Dunbar's study of various indigenous cultures from the Walbiri of Australia to the Hutterite colonies (Similar to the Amish ;) ) who have each maintained the magical number of 150 as maximum population strengths because, past this they have experienced rifts within the colonies. This 150 is also the reason Graham Bell chose to use the 7 digit telephone number system. Its also the same reason for a combat group within the army to be limited to a max of 200 people even though we have better communication equipment now than ever before.

Though this offers an explanation of why it is so, I would like to argue that we as humans have evolved well past this point. We have new tools and technologies at our disposal. Why do we still behave the same way as the Hutterites? Why do we still use archaic and inaccurate methods of survival? We need a new strategy. We have to force ourselves not to classify people into groups but rather to strive to know each of them as individuals. We have to force our brains to organize differently. Though this seems far fetched, this is not the case because the brain very often reallocates other parts of the brain to take on the functions of any other part. We are very malleable. We have to take advantage of this aspect.

Any thoughts?

Saturday, January 15, 2005

Moments Captured: A New and Unique Concept

Guys, Mihir and I were talking about the movie and we thought of changing things around a little bit. I think it's a little early for our movie making team to actually jump out and start making a full-fledged movie, even if its a short one. We haven't graduated to that level and being a strong believer in climbing steps than leaping and hoping to make it, I suggest we take a different approach.

We came up with the idea of making a 30 minute short movie capturing those special moments - funny ones, touching ones, romantic ones, angry ones, etc. and shooting the entire thing and putting it together. The end product will be the movie in which there will be several of these moments shot. Each clip will have its own introduction and then the actual scene (single scene) acted out. Not only will this be unique but the movie could be shot in several steps in several styles and then pieced together in the form of the lives of 20-something-desi's.

I invite you all to contribute your own little special moments that you can think of. Please post them here as comments to this post and describe it in as much detail as possible. After we have received them from you, we will choose some of them (collectively) based on do-ability and begin shooting it.

Please contribute all moments no matter how insignificant you think they are. This is an experiment only.

Monday, January 10, 2005

Blind Mole. Redux.

I like evolution. I like the way our genes are transferred imperfectly from generation to generation ironically to achieve a better adapted being. Just think about it, imperfections leading to perfection. It's amazing.

However, what we are provided with is what we experience the world around us with. Just as the blind mole believes that it exists in a world filled with smells, we try to understand the world with the five senses we have been provided. What if we actually need more senses to make full sense of the world but the evolutionary process has just not been able to get us there yet.

What's worse is that maybe some of us have been provided those genes that allow us to develop that sixth sense. But we have discarded that evolutionary leap and instead made efforts to fit in with everybody around us. Maybe we would understand what ghosts and spirits really are. Maybe we would be able to explain all the physical phenomenon that we have so far been unable to explain. Maybe we would no longer call those flying objects 'unidentified'. Maybe if we had more senses we would know that this world works with a fourth, fifth or sixth dimension.

But we have been blessed with faculties more powerful than any other being on earth - self consciousness, the ability to reason, logic and mathematics. Do these powers enable us to understand the truth of the world or are they simply allowing us to make sense of the world as we know it. In other words, would these powers enable us to discover the other qualities of the universe by bringing us out of our existing shells or do they impede our understanding by simply trying to haphazardly explain the world we live in?

Many of the theories and laws that we hold as hallowed truths are constantly being disputed by every new generation of thinkers and scientists who have new evidence to suggest that our current understanding of the world is flawed. The deeper understanding we develop of any field of study, the more unknowns we run into. Even Mathematics, a field of study we are proud to say is completely based on universal logic, cannot exist without crutches.Take for instance the imaginary number 'i', without which certain calculations in negative numbers is just plain impossible.

Is the body of knowledge we have accumulated since the dawn of consciousness of man taking us in a direction towards a better understanding of the universe or are we inserting imaginary numbers everywhere we run into things we cannot fathom so that we can believe we have a decent understanding of the world and gain some comfort in that almost baseless belief. Did we create the concept of 'God' in a similar effort?

My mind wanders and ponders these kinds of issues. I might be completely rambling and thinking with the wrong organ, but I thought I should put my thoughts down and let you guys offer your opinions and thereby help me make better sense of this world I don't fully understand. :)

Saturday, January 08, 2005

What's it worth?

We walked hand in hand, on that slightly chilly fall evening. We took a slight detour towards the benches outside the museum as we were in no hurry to return home. It was a wonderful office party and even though she dreaded having to go back on Monday and see the same people again, we did have a good time. And it wasn't often that we had a real reason to dress up and look as good and as tipsy as we did.

"You look so cute with a bow tie. I could bite you right now!", she teased.

"If you like it that much I 'll wear it all the time from now on. You think this will look good with my 'Van Halen' T-Shirt?"

Much as it made me look like a waiter, I like the way I look in a tuxedo - gelled-back hair, sleek, black suit with a black satin lapel, a brilliant white shirt, gold cuff-links, wing-tipped oxfords and a bow tie. She was dressed in a black dress that accentuated her form, black heels, and a simple diamond solitaire pendant. It always surpised me that so little could make someone look so good. I was just considering how beautiful she looked, when she caught me.

"Eight years together, still not lost it, have I?", she said, nonchalant. I nodded my consent and held her closer.

People say that once you know what's in the package, you don't really care how it's wrapped, but this wasn't true for me. I knew who she really was from the inside. I had seen and experienced her realities, I had withstood her lies and I knew every one of her subtle expressions so well, that she could never play poker with me anymore. But this was what I cherished deep inside my heart. There were the precious things only I knew. Only I held her decoder ring.

Just then, we turned around a bend and almost walked into a man standing there. It was odd that he would be standing right around a corner on this lonely street. It occurred to me that we might be in trouble, but as correct as my deduction might have been, it was important for me to play the part and simply try to excuse myself and walk away.

"Excuse me, I didn't see you there. I almost walked into you and spilt your coffee. Sorry about that." Saying that, I tried to make our way around him when he put a step in my way.

Love, being an unquantifiable state or quality was a little confusing to an objective and logical man that I was. Therefore, in order to understand it better in the metrics I lived my life in, I had imagined the both of us in several situations of varying degrees of danger and my reactions in each of them.

For instance, if there was tree falling on us, I would push her out of the way and then try to save myself. If we were skiing together and I lost control and was heading towards her, I would just force myself to dive into the snow. If she was coming at me, I would take the hit and stop her before she ran into the trees.

But in case of a mugging, I had always thought that the mature and logical thing to do was to simply hand over the wallet as we could always make money another day. But I know that there are some really crazy people out there, so if the thug made any advances towards my wife, the weapon he was threatening us with would be used against him, be it at the risk of my loosing my life. It was all clearly laid out in my head. I had planned it out meticulously. I had considered that there would be a lot of adrenaline rushing through all of us. I would have to move slowly and always indicate what I was doing lest he thinks I am reaching for a weapon. I would hand over the wallet smoothly and cause no rush of any sort; tell him how much money there was and then simply ask him to leave us in a non-threatening way. Looking down at the ground all the time was important not only for the sake of assuming a non-threatening pose but to also indicate that I would not be able to identify him to the cops later on.

But I never wanted to put these things to the test. But here it was. So I just reacted the way I had always trained myself to do. Just as a soldier in a battle acts by instinct rather than by thinking, I quietly reached into my pocket for my wallet and handed it to him, told him there was four hundred dollars and that we simply wanted to leave without any trouble.

Having acted and delivered my line perfectly, I waited for the result. As nothing came for two seconds, I looked up to see a man with a quizzical expression on his face. He paused for a second, handed me my wallet back and said,

"What the hell have you been drinking? I am a detective of the PPD. This is a crime scene, you cannot walk this way. Take the next street over."

Mortified, I turned around to face her only to be met with that expression on her face that said, "I should have left you long ago!"

Friday, January 07, 2005

Chalne ke pehle tanik dekhke payr rakhiye!

Mehfil bhari huin thi, shaam jawaan tha. Ustad abhi tak laapata the, par sab logon ke cheron par muskuraahat tha. Isthihaar kaiee dinon se, sheher ke kone kone pe lagaaye gaye hone se ek bhi tashreef khaali nahin tha. Ha, aur Ustad Charan Biryaanee Khaan bhi bahot mashoor the!

Usi bhari mehfil mein ek nawjawaan apne katore leke logon ko sabjiyaan bechte huen nikal raha tha. Usi waqt duniyaan ke mashoor, Lahore ke Shahensha, Laapata gali ki noor-e-taj, Ustad Charan Biryaanee Khaan stage pe padhaare. Logon ke chehre pe se muskaan hat gaya; uh, itni kadar thi unke liye!

Ustad mike uthaaye, aur logon mein hulchal ho gayi.

“Huzoor, mujhe maarne deejiye!” log bol…uh….nahin rahe the!

Kuch daer baad, sab log chup ho gaye, aur Ustad Charan Biryaanee Khaan ke labzon se motiyaan girne lage:

“Arz hai…”

“Wah wah! Huzoor, wah wah!”

Ustad apne priy shishy ko ek do second dekhe; shishy paan chaba rahe the.

“Arz hai.”

“Wah wah! Huzoor, wah…”

“Chupbe!”

Ha, tho Ustad keh rahe the:

“Taron ko koste ho tum…”

“Ustad woh last week ho gaya!”

Ustad kuch has kar bole, “Puraani hai!”

Koi peeche se bola, “Tho naya waala ugal saale!” Woh janaab unke behnoi the.

Ustad phir se has kar aage badhe:

“Arz hai:
Arre o sabjee bechne waale,
Gujarte ho tum uss galiyon mein,”
Ruk kar, effect ke liye phirse arz kiye:

“Abbe o sabjee bechne waale,
Gujarte ho tum uss galiyon mein,
Jahaan tamaatar ki zaroorat hai,
Par hai paayz tumhaare taraazoo mein.”

Ustad tanik turn karke apne shishy ko nihaare. Woh chup rehke paan chabaa rahe the. Thoda bahot bhaawuk hoke Ustad aage nikle:

“Himmat hain tere dil mein,
Kaabil hai tere haat,
Atthanni hai tere paaket mein,
Moti hai tere dimaak”

Ustad phir se apne sishy ko nihaare. Woh paan chabaa rahe the.

“Karoon tho karoon kya,
Boloon tho boloon kya?
Mere labj hai tujpe zaaya,
Boloonga tho samjhegi sirf meri aaya.”

Ustad apne shishy ko nahin nihaarte hue aage badhe.

“Rakhkhon apne paas jo log chaahe,
Bechonge tum jyaada,
Par karte ho tum jo man chaahe,
Rahoge tum bhikaari saala.

Meri baat maan,
Bechdo, behn-chod, apni gaadi,
Sabji mandi chod de,
Ghar waapas jaon, niklo abhi.

Tera kuch nahin hone waala,
Tu rahega sirf bhikaari,
Saale ja mar,
Jaakar kaheen.”

Unki shaayari khatam hote hee Ustaad apne sar jhukaake, mehfil ke sajjanon se aadaab kiye. Logon mein tehelka mach gaya. Ek ke oopar ek uchal rahe the. Koi kursi pe khada hua tha tho, koi mej pe. Ek ke baad ek Ustaad pe thu thu karke tamaatar phenkne lage. Tamaatr ki barsaat ho rahi thi – gande badbudaar tamaatar. Par, usme, ek bhi pyaas nahin tha.

Peeche, darwaaje ke baajoon mein, ek sajjan notein gin rahe the. Unke mooh pe ek delicate muskaan saja hua tha.

Aadaab huzoor.